Wednesday, November 13, 2024
26.1 C
Freetown
26.1 C
Freetown
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
Home Blog Page 22

ERNEST BAI KORMA AND THE MID-TERM CENSUS

Ernest Bai Koroma

Mahmud Tim Kargbo

Ernest Bai Koroma allowed his party puppets to deceive the highly illiterate APC supporters and members by referring to the MID-TERM Census as an illegal census and that their supporters and members mustn’t participate.

After defaulters that ignorantly listened to the orders of Koroma’s puppets were prosecuted by the Bio led government, same Ernest Bai Koroma is now saying the mid-term census isn’t illegal, but there are specific concerns that they need to address.

So why is Ernest Bai Koroma only coming out now to say these words after poor APC supporters and members that came in brush with the law are now facing prosecution?

This continues to show Ernest Bai Koroma harbours NO INTEREST for the majority of APC members and supporters. All he’s interested in is how to use and abuse the ordinary people to protect his looted wealth.

DO NOT JUDGE THE SIERRA LEONE JUDICIARY WITH BIAS PARAMETER BUT WITH OBJECTIVE AND NATIONAL PARAMETER

Chief Justice, His Lordship Justice Desmond Babatunde Edwards

By Emperor Bailor Jalloh Journalist in Freetown

Ask for the truth and you may not like what you hear. Look for the truth and you may be shocked by what you see. Speak the truth and people may not believe you. But if you choose to ignore the truth, all you will be left with are lies.

The Sierra Leone Judiciary has been at the centre of Reformation and Rebranding under the leadership of the current Chief Justice, His Lordship Justice Desmond Babatunde Edwards in a bid to ensure justice dispensation in a democratic legal system such as expediting court trials, deployment of resident Magistrates across the country, fair court trials of opposition politicians, creation of the Sexual Offences Model Court and the Anti-Corruption Court, conduction of special criminal sessions across the country, the establishment of an official website for the Judiciary/digitalization, recruitment of qualified staff and women empowerment in the Judiciary and many more.

Despite the aforementioned achievements and positivity, other people are still judging the Sierra Leone Judiciary with Bias parameters, instead of Objective and National parameters. As there is no perfection in humanity likewise the Sierra Leone Judiciary but do not judge this state institution with Bias Parameter but with Objective and National Parameter in a democratic legal system. Welcoming website users to the official website of Sierra Leone Judiciary, His Lordship Justice Desmond Babatunde Edwards expressed commitment to Justice Service Delivery in Sierra Leone. ” As you visit our website for information on our Courts or our wide-ranging resources, we do hope you would be able to use same to measure how far we have come to making our vision ” accessible, fair and expeditious justice for all in Sierra Leone a reality”. he stated.

Justice Edwards furthered that ” Ours is a job to settle matters of conflict peaceably between individuals. As the Bible assures us in Mathew 5:9, ” Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God”, we hope that this beatitude endears us to work with the zeal and zest to making the difference in the Justice Service Delivery “. Said, Chief Justice.

In a similar vein, the Director of Communications of the Sierra Leone Judiciary, Journalist Elkass Sannoh also showcased considerable achievements of the Sierra Leone Judiciary in three years in the office of Chief Justice Desmond Babatunde Edwards. Director Sannoh, who was featured on African Young Voices ( AYV) Television in Freetown on Sunday outlined such achievements: First virtual court, a responsive website, more than ever before uploading court judgements on a daily basis www.judiciary.gov.sl, as well as cases assigned to Judges for adjudication, justice application to ensure effective service delivery in Magistrates’ Courts, recruitment of qualified staff to senior positions and for the first time with good salary increment, jobs to more women at senior management level among others.

Conclusively, do not judge the Sierra Leone Judiciary with Bias parameters but with Objective and National parameters.

MORE REVELATIONS ON ERNEST BAI KOROMA’S DICTATORSHIP TACTICS IN THE APC

Ernest Bai Koroma
Ernest Bai Koroma
SLL Audio News
MORE REVELATIONS ON ERNEST BAI KOROMA'S DICTATORSHIP TACTICS IN THE APC
Loading
/

Sierra Leone Journalists’ ability to hold power to account will be more necessary than ever. The media must not waste this opportunity. Sierra Leone Live will not.

Well, if Ernest Bai Koroma asked for a survey to be conducted on the most popular APC presidential aspirant for the past 2018 presidential elections, and cancelled the outcome of the survey because it didn’t go the way of his favoured aspirant (Samura Mathew Wilson Kamara), then Ernest Bai Koroma is an authoritarian whose excesses must be properly checked for the good of our country’s democracy.

Let us assume that Ernest Bai Koroma was genuinely elected to govern Sierra Leone as President. Assume, moreover, that he appointed to his cabinet and sub-cabinet many men and women who are experienced and dedicated. How, then, can a president—certainly no less mentally alert—with many advisers of high caliber, produce such an undistinguished presidency that left his government declared austerity measures despite the sound economic status he inherited from his predecessor and the hike in prices of raw materials plus the many mining contracts signed by his government?

It’s a puzzlement. And it cannot be accounted for by most of the explanations currently in vogue, such as Ernest Bai Koroma an outsider businessman who really doesn’t understand the levers of national governance; or Ernest Bai Koroma surrounds himself with a “Mafia Team” whose weaknesses are the same as his own; or Ernest Bai Koroma was a bad manager who wasn’t been able to sort out decisions that a president must make from those that should be settled at lower levels; or Parliament was so uncontrollable that it allowed Ernest Bai Koroma to exercised the reins of leadership to his advantage and promote his authoritative actions, or Ernest Bai Koroma allowed the bad bureaucracy to an extent it grown beyond the span of presidential control; or many of the nation’s problems were highly intractable because Ernest Bai Koroma was busy using his presidency to amassed unexplained wealth for himself and his family members, or even all these reasons —although there is truth in all.

I would like to put forward another theory: The root of the problem is that Ernest Bai Koroma was the very first authoritative President in Sierra Leone’s history after Sierra Leone’s eleven years bloody civil war.

“A blooded dictatorship President”—using a definition by Aaron Wildavsky and Jack Knott—means that Koroma places “greater emphasis only on methods, procedures and instruments for making policy that will benefit his personal interest than on the content of policy itself.”

Koroma claimed to “run Sierra Leone like a business”. He wanted to do things. Yet his campaign statements should have warned us that save for using the presidency to buy unmerited international fame, his passion in government was for how things were done to meet his self-centred interest, rather than what should have been done for the general good.

He believed that if the process to satisfy his personal interest was good the product will be good. In other words, if he sets up a procedure for making policy that was criminally organised to be opened, comprehensive (his favourite words), and involved people that worked to satisfy his selfish interest, whatever came out of this pipeline was acceptable (within certain budgetary limits).

A concern for the process was not a bad thing. But Ernest Bai Koroma’s presidency made a fetish of chaos in policy development, often resulting in proposals that had not been fully explored in the interest of the general good, but his personal desire to illegally amassed wealth at the expense of the suffering majority.

But a process with no genuine intention is only a tool for getting from here to there—it is not a substitute for substance. That was why Ernest Bai Koroma’s fake process that was coined to be good in the eyes of the illiterate majority, ended up only producing conflicting, competing and confusing programmes to a point his government ended up declaring austerity measures.

BOGSAT

Ernest Bai Koroma’s presidency lacked an overriding genuine design for what he wanted his government to do in the interest of the public, his department chiefs were forced to prepare presidential options in a vacuum. Usually, this is done by BOGSAT—the acronym for a “bunch of guys sitting around a table.” In other cases, where political executives have not been given some framework in which to function to satisfy the selfish interest of Ernest Bai Koroma, they imposed their own hidden agendas on the president and tell the public “am doing this through the wisdom of the president”. As if they were brainless chickens with no wisdom to reason well and do things on their own.

Each departmental proposal—whether for welfare reform or tax reform—may or may not be “right,” but there was no reason to expect that automatically it would fall in place with what other departments proposed. Ironically, Koroma’s procedures assure, by definition, that he cannot deal with the nation’s ills comprehensively because his personal interest was put right on top of the nation’s interest.

Most political executives and high-level civil servants preferred to be loyal to this oppressive president. If the direction was forthcoming, they tried—successfully—to honour Koroma’s personal interest. When the direction was not present, they will go into business for themselves.

The Koroma presidency cannot be described—as was sometimes true of past Ahmad Tejan Kabbah’s administration—in terms of State House loyalists versus cabinet department disloyalists. Throughout his presidency, neither State House staff nor cabinet officials were given the predictive capacity that they must have to do their jobs properly by putting the interest of the country ahead of all other interests. A subordinate—even on the cabinet level—was able to plan on the basis of some self-centred Koroma cabal pattern.

Take government reorganisation policy. Some of Koroma’s actions support the concept of centralisation (energy); some support the concept of decentralisation (education). On what basis was an administration planner to design the next reorganisation?

Uncertainty radiating from the top, furthermore, lowers morale throughout the permanent government, hence it adversely affected the implementation of programmes. While the bureaucracy may be the butt of jokes, it is also the motor force that provided services on a day-to-day basis—and it too looks for consistent signs from a president.

Sierra Leone presidents have not been ideologues. And it is certainly not my notion that Koroma was to become one. But all modern presidents, whether “All People’s Congress” or “Sierra Leone People’s Party”—no matter what their other faults—have had some programmatic view of government in which the specific parts usually could be fitted. This is not the case with Koroma’s domestic programme, although he does have a firmer view of oppressive policy against right-minded people within his All People’s Congress political party and others in the country (perhaps because of his history to criminally changed the APC constitution in his favour and did very bad deals as a Member of Parliament).

So the basic problem of this current APC administration will not be corrected by rearranging boxes on organisation charts or by doing a better selling job to the public. Koroma must be challenged internationally to bring his years of oppressive tactics against Sierra Leone’s development to an end.

What has produced an undistinguished presidency and Chairmanship and ruler for the APC? Ernest Bai Koroma’s failure to set consistent policy goals that will move the APC forward to meet the test of times—or more grandly, a philosophy for the government when he was lording over the affairs of the state.

Attach are documents showing how Ernest Bai Koroma refused to accept a survey that was done by the APC to choose a popular APC flagship aspirant and went on pushing Samura Mathew Wilson Kamara in the throats of APC members as his own preferred flagship aspirant.

Chinese Medical Teams Bid Farewell to H. E. President Julius Maada Bio

Chinese Medical Team

President Bio

On December 21, 2021, three Chinese medical teams i.e. the China Medical Team, the Chinese Military Medical Expert Group and the CDC P3 Lab Expert Team called on His Excellency President Julius Maada Bio. The outgoing teams took the opportunity to bid farewell to the President and expressed gratitude to the Sierra Leonean government and people for the strong support and close cooperation.

H.E. President Julius Maada Bio thanked H. E. President Xi Jinping and the government and people of China for the long-term valuable support to Sierra Leone in various fields and commended the Chinese medical teams for their significant contributions to Sierra Leone’s health development. President Bio said that the Sierra Leonean government and people will always have fond memories of the work of the Chinese medical teams.

H.E. Ambassador Hu Zhangliang said that public health sector is always the major focus of China-Sierra Leone friendly cooperation and China will work closely with Sierra Leone to implement the important consensus reached by H.E. President Xi Jinping and His Excellency Julius Maasa Bio on the development of China-Sierra Leone bilateral relations.

Full Text: Hong Kong: Democratic Progress Under the Framework of One Country, Two Systems

President Xi Jinping Made New Commitments at FOCAC conference to the Promotion of China-Africa Cooperation.

BEIJING, Dec. 20 (Xinhua) — China’s State Council Information Office on Monday issued a white paper, titled “Hong Kong: Democratic Progress Under the Framework of One Country, Two Systems.”

Please see the attachment for the full text of the document. Enditem

Full Text: Hong Kong: Democratic Progress Under the Framework of One Country, Two Systems

Download the PDF of the News Bulletin: China Issues White paper on the Development of Democracy in Hong Kong

WHAT IT TAKES TO BE A LEADER IN THE MILLENNIUM

Bill George

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

Sharing the first part of the interview that I conducted with the inspiring Bill George when he was at Duke. Bill shares his insight on authenticity, the impact of faith and tradition. He says ” I think you have to be real in order to gain the trust of the people. At the end of the day, you’re asking them to put themselves on the line for a cause and if they don’t trust you they won’t give you their whole hearts.

Authenticity is crucial to leadership in today’s volatile environment, the Harvard Business School professor and author said in an interview.

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2021

Good leadership isn’t about status or power or faking it till you make it, said Bill George.

Instead, good leaders take the time to discern who they are, and to follow the deeply held beliefs, values and principles that guide them, he said.

“What people are looking for is someone who is real and authentic. People know who is authentic or not,” he said.

George is a professor of management practice at Harvard Business School, where he teaches leadership. He is the author of “Seven Lessons for Leading in Crisis,” “True North,” “Finding Your True North” and “Authentic Leadership.”

A former chairman and CEO of Medtronic, George also was a senior executive with Honeywell and Litton Industries and served in the U.S. Department of Defense. He earned a B.S. in industrial engineering from Georgia Tech and an MBA from Harvard University.

He and his wife, Penny, are members of Plymouth Congregational Church in Minneapolis and the founders of the George Family Foundation, which funds the newly established Penny Pilgram George Women’s Leadership Initiative at Duke.

George was interviewed for Faith and Leadership by myself (Mahmud Tim Kargbo), co-owner of https://sierraleonelive.com when George was at Duke to give a lecture at the Fuqua School of Business. The following is an edited transcript.

Q: What has changed in how we lead today compared with the past?

Much of what we taught in business school is that the world is predictable, and you can create a strategic plan that will last for five years. Today, the world is volatile. It is chaotic, and it is highly ambiguous. We have to teach leaders to make decisions under the conditions of ambiguity.

They must use their minds and ears to have the courage to make decisions when they really don’t know what is going to happen. They must be ready to adapt to changing conditions; leaders today must be highly adaptable.

Q: What does it take to be a great leader?

To be a great leader today, you have to have a great head and a great heart. As Thich Nhat Hanh said, “The longest journey that you will ever take is the 18 inches from your head to your heart.”

You might have a high IQ, but if you do not have emotional intelligence, then you are not going to be successful. Qualities like passion, compassion, empathy and courage — those are all matters of the heart, and we can’t teach those in business school classrooms.

You learn those through experience, by going out into the world, by learning those skills, by taking on different roles and then growing. It’s a developmental thing; you must develop the qualities of the heart.

Sometimes you have to go against the grain. When everyone goes left, you might need to choose to go right. That takes real courage — to put everything on the line when you might fail when the organisation might fail.

I believe that everybody has the capacity to be a leader at all levels of the organisation. What people are looking for is someone who is real and authentic. People know who is authentic or not. You cannot “fake it to make it.” People see right through you.

I think you have to be real in order to gain the trust of people. At the end of the day, you are asking them to put themselves on the line for a cause, and if they don’t trust the leader, they will never give you their whole hearts.

They might give you their minds. They might give you their hands. But never their whole hearts. They won’t be fully engaged with what they are doing — they won’t be fully passionate.

That is the mark of a true leader.

Q: In your books, you argue that authenticity is crucial for leadership. What does it mean to be truly authentic as a leader?

You have to be real and genuine. There is no magic here. You can’t pretend to be something you are not.

You also have to continue to develop yourself. You grow from your authentic self, and you become a developed self. You gain self-awareness, you solidify your values, you gain confidence and courage, and you gain the willingness to take on difficult circumstances because of your authentic base.

You know who you are based on your story and the crucibles that you have overcome. That is what it means to be an authentic leader.

Q: A major part of your identity and your authenticity is your faith. How has your faith influenced your idea of servant leadership?

I teach at a secular institution. I don’t believe in proselytising people, but I do believe in sharing my faith if someone asks.

One of the best experiences that I’ve had was when I was a student at Harvard Business School. We brought in a man named Robert Greenleaf, and he brought in his idea of servant leadership. I thought, “That’s right! Authentic leaders are servant leaders. We are here to serve, and people are not here to serve us. We are here to serve other people.”

We have to do this well, and we have to overcome the idea of power and status. Examine whether or not you are really a servant leader. Are you serving a cause?

The good thing about the millennials today is that we are going from the Me Generation, the generation that I was part of, to the We Generation. The millennials are really not focused on self-interest but are much more committed to a cause.

They want to get involved in Teach For their countries; they want to get involved in social enterprise; they want to get involved in a government, that is really committed to global sustainability and opportunities for all irrespective of status or political party affiliations. I say, “God bless them!” Let’s give them the opportunities to do just that.

Q: In the face of all of this change, traditions are often seen as a hindrance to innovation. But traditions can also ground us. How can we draw on our traditions as a path toward innovation?

Our traditions give us the basis for what we believe. They can be a powerful basis that is tied to our mission and to our values. It is like the roots of the oak tree that we must nourish.

When I went to Medtronic, it was very much a Christian place, and I am Christian. It was very comfortable, but you know, it wasn’t comfortable for all people. We had one Jewish officer that said that he felt very out of place.

We had to broaden that tradition into a much wider range. Today, a devout Muslim heads Medtronic. The important thing is that we were open to diversity. You have to honour people for who they are regardless of their belief traditions. We must come together around a common mission and purpose, regardless of one’s faith or non-faith or traditions.

Traditions [must] become that of the group and come out of the mission and purpose of the government or whatever organisation.

OUR PIECE ON THE “SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS”

Sustainable Development Goals

Worthy of Support

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

The United Nations General Assembly agreed on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in September. An initial draft of these goals generated heated public discussion. Even the Economist entered the fray and devoted three articles to the SDGs in a recent edition. The question is whether the 17 goals and 169 targets in the draft are an ambitious response to global challenges or an unwise mess.

We believe that while fine-tuning can be done, it is important not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. The SDGs are worthy of support.

The SDGs have been developed through an unprecedented process of stakeholder involvement. 193 governments have had their say. An online survey conducted by the United Nations, My World, has had more than 7m responses. Businesses with assets of tens of trillions of dollars have been consulted. There have been thematic, regional and country discussions all over the world. Academics and scientists have analysed every goal and target and debated the cost-effectiveness of achieving them.

Not surprisingly, the agenda that has emerged is broader than the MDGs. But at least it gives voice to a range of different people. Developed countries tend to insist on gender equality, human rights, climate change and actions against deforestation in any development agenda. Yet these are among the lowest five priorities indicated in the My World survey. The only way to include the priorities of rich and poor is by adding to the agenda.

Like its predecessor, the overarching goal of the SDGs is to end poverty. Part of the reason why there are 17 SDGs compared to eight MDGs is precisely to increase the chances of success of this central goal. It is inconceivable to think today about ending poverty without simultaneously achieving peace, tackling corruption robustly, but appropriately, dealing with natural disasters, connecting people to a market economy via better access to infrastructure or reducing the impact of climate change. None of these issues is addressed in the MDGs, but they have to be tackled because an integrated agenda is so critical to ending poverty especially in my country Sierra Leone.

No politician would dare try and communicate the 17 goals to their constituency. But there is a simple way of clustering the goals into themes where the purpose is clear. The SDGs aim to end poverty and hunger, give any child an opportunity to a decent life, create an environment where business can flourish and create jobs and growth and do all this within the natural boundaries set by our planet.

Simply, the MDGs are about reducing poverty. The SDGs are about ending poverty and building global prosperity and sustainability.

Laudable as the goals maybe, they will be of little value without an effective framework for action. That was precisely what the Financing for Development conference (held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in July) and the post-2015 development agenda aim to do. The draft accord for the Addis conference recognised that each country has primary responsibility for its economic and social development. At the same time, it called for collective efforts. The draft accord prioritised aid allocations, private investment, channelling global savings at low-interest rates to build infrastructure cheaply and more effective contributions from multilateral institutions. It also spelt out the most important areas for global action- trade, financial stability, climate change, technology transfer and even the data gathering that will be needed to monitor the SDGs.

Of cause, there is room for significant improvement in the SDGs, notably in the choice and wording of many of the 169 targets. Some are clearly not achievable as those may undercut the overall credibility of the package if left as it is. But there Is a process on the way to address the most glaring deficiencies.

It is most important to appreciate the political process that has led to this draft. Like all democratic processes, the result may be messy and leave many dissatisfied, but it reflects compromise and a desire for consensus. At a time when so much of the world is caught up in divisions, conflicts and corruption, a truly global effort to create a better life for all and a sustainable future for our planet is a cause to celebrate not denigrate.
Hope our politicians in Sierra Leone will get the better part of these goals.

ON THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION WHO SHOULD SIERRA LEONE POLITICIANS LISTEN TO?

Corruption and Politics in Sierra Leone

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

I tweeted about corruption in Sierra Leone politics (bribery, lobbying, extortion, cronyism, nepotism, parochialism, patronage, influence peddling, graft, and embezzlement). And the response was really interesting. Here’s the tweet in my Twitter feed:

“Most Sierra Leoneans do not have a problem with corruption; they just have a problem with who has done it. If it is their favourites then they become defensive, and when it is their ‘enemies’ they ask why they are not in prison.”

Many said politicians in Sierra Leone don’t listen and they do not do what the electorate wants. Understandable although these views are, it leaves us with a lot of open questions.

First, it came clear from the responses that when many said politicians in Sierra Leone don’t listen in the fight against corruption what they meant is the politicians do not listen to me! It is an understandable conundrum that we all sometimes equate our views with that of the wider electorate at large. What we believe they must believe and the politicians don’t listen. If only it was as simple as that. Often the electorate at large do not share what we are passionate about or there is an evenly divided public. And often on some issues (like the “fight against corruption or the fight to protect taxpayers monies”), the electorate at large may hold views that we find abhorrent.

So when we say Sierra Leone politicians are not accountable what do we mean? Are they not accountable to the electorate or is it that they just do not agree with our personal views? And if we are to make them more accountable then how do we do it? Do we make them accountable to a local political party caucus or do we have referenda and recall so the total electorate can all decide? It is a dilemma. Politicians are selected by a political party caucus but voted in by the general electorate. So, whom do they represent – the political party caucus or the electorate who voted them in – and what happens when the views of the electorate and the caucus diverge as in the case of the “fight against corruption or the fight to protect taxpayers monies”?

One of the big political process questions of our time in Sierra Leone is how we equate political party democracy with electoral democracy, and there’s no easy answer. Because there’s no easy answer it makes it equally easy to say politicians don’t listen to us in the fight against corruption or the fight to protect taxpayers monies, but it is never that simple.

I think it is important that we all think this through in Sierra Leone or we end up all our lives attacking straw men or constantly living in anger because our politicians and sometimes indeed the electorate do not see the world as we do. Holding the moral high ground is never enough in a democracy because democracy is about diversity and engagement and not simply about moral imperatives.

And if we have a passion then we sometimes find that fact hard to bear, but it is the cross we all suffer if we believe in democracy.

An interesting and important post!

How important is it for Sierra Leone politicians President, Ministers and Members of Parliament to listen and fight corruption sincerely to the advantage of the suffering majority? I fear that most of the public believe that politicians have a “duty” towards them as constituents. It may shock many to understand that majority of our Sierra Leone politicians believe they have no legal or statutory obligation to represent us, but their political parties caucus and their personal interests. Many may suggest that this has indeed been the case when hoping that a politician in Sierra Leone will fight for them and ensure taxpayers monies are wisely used to their advantage. So, the question “Who should Sierra Leone Politicians listen to in the fight against corruption when the majority of them are benefiting from corruption?” Surely, it should be the constituents or the general public.

However, Sierra Leone Politicians by nature of their position have “conflicts of interest” – on one hand wanting to protect their political leadership and party, and, on the other hand, pretending to be a “problem solver” to the vast issues that constituents face. So, this all begs another question, in my view – “Should politicians in Sierra Leone have political persuasion or be community champions, instead?” I feel that many may feel that the latter role is more reflective of the needs of the people.

However, whether it is a political role or a community one, let us not be fooled into believing that neither requires a “job description” and the same “targets” that politicians have placed upon the teachers or the Permanent Secretaries practising in the public sector. Without the ability to “measure” performance and productivity how can we then judge the quantitative and qualitative progress of our public servants who we pay?

Finally, it may well be argued that ALL politicians, including the President, Members of Parliament, Ministers and Councillors – MUST be accountable to “independent scrutiny” without the interference of NO powers from above. ONLY if social mobility, departmental waste, policy development and failings are as fundamental in the quality of its building and initiation as it is to its performance and credibility to the lives of the public and taxpayer it aims to serve. Thus, engaging, listening, learning and empowering have to be strengthened in order to build the BEST relationship with the public and to deliver the BEST policies and practices that enable effective resources towards “care” and drive upwards social mobility to reach those less fortunate in order to rebuild the lives of the suffering majority in our country.

Minister of Planning entreats communities on the importance of the Mid-Term Census

Minister of Planning

The Minister of Planning and Economic Development, Dr Francis Kai-Kai has encouraged communities in Kambia and Port Loko Districts to welcome enumerators from Statistics Sierra Leone and to be counted in the ongoing 2021 Mid-Term Population and Housing Census.

He made this statement during field visits in Kambia and Port Loko Districts respectively to monitor and assess the progress of the ongoing census enumeration process that commenced on the 10th December 2021.

He informed them that participation of community members in the census will inform and guide the planning of government, NGOs and private sector development programs in their communities.

Minister Kai-Kai stated that an undercount would affect allocation and funding for schools, health services, child care, emergency services and many other livelihood programs, adding that the outcome of this census will establish a credible database for development planning, monitoring, coordination and evaluation at all levels.

The Minister also held meetings with Stats-SL staff in Kambia and Port Loko at their respective offices to receive updates on various aspects of the Mid-Term Census process in their respective districts.

In a brief address, the Minister thanked the teams for their effort, urging them to ensure that all issues related to the process are communicated on time in order to address them amicably.

Ends

For more information, please contact:
©️MoPED Communications
23279174027/ +23276743202

Statement by the African Parliamentary Press Network (APPN) on resolution of issues that led to the suspension of PAP election session

APN Logo

Download the PDF file of the Press Release

The African Parliamentary Press Network (APPN) commends the
intervention of the Executive Council of the African Union (AU), the
Chairperson of the African Union Commission, H.E. Moussa Faki Mahamat
and the other policy organs of the AU in working assiduously and
harmoniously to ensure that the misunderstanding that led to disruption of
proceedings at the Fourth Ordinary Session of the Fifth Parliament of the PanAfrican Parliament (PAP) were resolved in line with the established African
Union values, rules, and regulations.

APPN recalls that the May election Session of PAP ended in chaos and/ or
disorder, due to disagreement among some regions on the application of the
principle of rotation in the election of the Parliament’s president.
APPN commends the AUC Chairperson H.E. Moussa Faki Mahamat for
setting up the fact-finding delegation that visited the PAP Secretariat and
submitted a progress report with far-reaching recommendations. The report
of the delegation formed the basis for the decisions and recommendations of
the policy organs.

The various interventions culminated in the decision of 39th Ordinary
Session of the African Union Executive Council in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
that only regions that have not had the opportunity to lead the Parliament
would be eligible to present candidates at the resumed bureau election to be
conducted and managed by the Office of Legal Counsel.

APPN urges the Parliamentarians to accept the resolution of the issue in good
faith and henceforth focus on issues that promote a united Africa instead of
dwelling on issues that tended to divide us. These include the manufacturing
of COVID-19 Vaccines and related drugs in Africa, challenges of youth
unemployment, under-development, poverty, insecurity, and promoting
participatory democracy.

The APPN takes this opportunity to call on all national Parliaments that are
yet to ratify the Malabo Protocol to do so to give the Pan-African Parliament
the needed legislative powers.

The APPN assures the Executive Council of the African Union (AU), and
the PAP of its unflinching support and collaboration in providing publicity and
education for all African citizens on the Continent on the activities of PAP to
make it very relevant to them.

About APPN

The African Parliamentary Press Network is a Network of African
journalists and information officers reporting from regional, sub-regional and
national Parliaments in Africa. APPN promotes parliamentary openness and
cordial working relationship between Parliaments and the media and believes
that a well mobilized and resourced press corps or galleries in all African
parliaments will set the stage for the work of African Parliaments, including
the Pan-African Parliament, to be made visible to the people of Africa.
Signed

Hon. Oluchukkwu Ibekwe Hon. Gilbert Borketey Boyefio
Steering Committee Chair Coordinator
African Parliamentary Press Network APPN Secretariat
+2348034077681 +233243915206

https://www.africanparliamentarynews.com/2021/12/appn-commends-au-for-decisions-on-pap.html
Download the PDF file of the Press Release

Freetown
overcast clouds
26.1 ° C
26.1 °
26.1 °
81 %
2.1kmh
94 %
Thu
29 °
Fri
28 °
Sat
29 °
Sun
30 °
Mon
27 °
0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe