Wednesday, November 13, 2024
25.8 C
Freetown
25.8 C
Freetown
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
Home Blog Page 24

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF SIERRA LEONE POLICE DEMYSTIFIES HIS OFFICE

In what was described by many as the seeming expression of frustration, disappointment, resentment and disgruntlement by the No.1 gentleman of the Republic of Sierra Leone Police. Dr Michael Ambrose Sovula, in an extraordinary august gathering of front line commanders in the Crime Management on Friday 5th November, this year, at the Senior Officers Mess, Kingtom, involving the Criminal Investigation Department (CID,) Family Support Unit (FSU,)Trans-National Organized Crime (TOCU) and Scientific Support Unit (SSU) respectively, the no-nonsense IGP in an unusual tone and disposition expressed his dissatisfaction and dismay over the attitude and conduct of Investigations done by the aforementioned departments and units.

The IGP who was once an accomplished Investigator and Prosecutor over the years did not mince his words. In an unprecedented outburst, he outrightly condemned the lethargic attitude of some investigators, citing the improper and inefficient entries in the diary of actions, wrong charges on files, delay in Investigation, absenteeism to testify in court, failure to exhaust alibis amongst others. Amidst all the shortcomings, inadequacies, and challenges, he however commended a few good supervisors and investigators who have been working assiduously and doing extremely well in their duties. He took umbrage on account of citizens perception about the Police which is unfavourable and unsavoury.

The IGP underscored the core values of the institution which amongst others are: to value her people and also to deliver quality services to them.

The Government of Sierra Leone he mentioned is making reasonable efforts to meet the welfare challenges that personnel are faced with.
Lastly, he commented about the forthcoming promotion, emphasizing that some personnel would be catapulted to higher ranks owing to the fact that they’ve proven their mettle and are worthy of recognition.

Prior to the address of the Inspector General of Police, the Deputy Head of Media and Public Relations Unit, Assistant Superintendent of Police, Samuel Saio Conteh, dilated on the misuse of information sharing bordering on public opinions, he spoke about ” miscommunication, misperception, and misinformation.

The Director of Crime Services, AIG William Fayia Sellu, remarked that the numerous challenges highlighted by the Inspector General of Police was acknowledged and would be given the attention it deserves, promised that there will be a paradigm shift in the disposition of personnel. He lavished praises on the IGP for his initiative on numerous activities that have motivated the rank and file of personnel generally, amongst which were: the *re-establishment of ranks, the colourful decorations of senior officers after being promoted to various ranks, construction of new facilities in the police barracks, supply of quality rice, revamping of communication infrastructure, refurbishment of police headquarters, and other edifices, training of personnel in the specialized units, moral support to the Peace Keeping Unit, the transformation of the Sports Unit with an Assistant Commissioner as a strategic supervisor

Appealed to the IGP to assist in facilitating local and international training for Investigators. He also informed the IGP that henceforth, he’ll ensure that the Crime Management is not only monitored, vetted but “audited” regularly in order to ensure sanity and sanctity. Various Personnel made contributions, noting that never in the history of the SLP, has such a meeting been held with the full participation of no less a personality than the Inspector General of Police.

The vote of thanks was done by Commissioner of Police, Mr Joseph Lahai, Head of Scientific Support Unit.

©️* *Detective Assistant Superintendent of Police, Michael Kelly Dumbuya* Crime Officer Congo Cross Police Division.

BIO “PAOPA” VERNACULAR ELITES ARE A THREAT TO NATIONAL COHESION

President Maada Bio of Sierra Leone

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

This is an important and timely period for our contraption. Historically, when Sierra Leone has faced serious challenges, the contraption has rallied together. Dialoguing to confront national problems is a mark of patriotic maturity, not a sign of weakness. I believe we need to talk in the belief that there is a problem that the contraption needs to deal with, and there is a fierce urgency.

Discourses of peace and non-violence, progress, development, and independence of a people, must be also about the root causes of poverty, inequality, current divisions in our society; the poor quality of leadership at State House to honour their party key “bread and butter” manifesto promised and other sectors of the current government, exploitation and domination at national levels. What is of supreme importance is a discourse on solutions that result in fundamental change and re-ordering of what we see and believe to be unacceptable and unsustainable. In this convening without condoning external causes, I want us to concentrate first on current national ills.

“PAOPA” TOXIC COMBINATION

Unfortunately, ‘divisions’ have become the currency of our politics and we must find a way of devaluing this currency. Until a cadre of leadership emerges in this contraption that is ready to commit ethnic and regional class even when they ascend to the office through these sectarian solidarities, the progress of this contraption will forever remain a mirage.
I keep on making the case that the current “Paopa” crisis of governance and development in our contraption is a crisis of the “Paopa’ elites. I called these elites vernacular elites purveying vernacular politics, completely unable to comprehend the challenges and demand of civic duty, other than through the prism of native lenses. It is a vernacularism that is currently afflicting the private sector elites even in a worse form, as evidenced by the ethnic concentrations in top management, and endemic favouritism in nearly all national appointments, recruitment, promotions, awarding of bonuses and contracts.

They (the “Paopa” elites) are the architects and beneficiaries-in-chief of graft and ethnicity, a deadly and toxic combination that has gnawed at the heart, body and soul of our great contraption and so badly scarred and compromised national institutions. It is my strong belief that until these “Paopa” elites resolve to make Sierra Leone better, choose the path of progressive politics and an inclusive development paradigm – which will also be in their long-term interest; rise to embrace civic rather than native politics, the contraption shall continue to wallow in poverty and remain trapped in the tragedy of underdevelopment both of her economy and democracy. I refuse to believe that because of our diversity, we are incapable of forging a modern, democratic state where, regardless of a person’s ethnic, regional or social background, he or she can ascend to any office and realise his or her full potential. What other scholars have called ‘cosmopolitan citizenship’ is possible in our contraption.

PATRIOTIC ELITES

What it requires is an imaginative and patriotic elite and leadership across the board that is genuinely ambitious and fascinated by the possibilities of creating one such contraption; not one uninspired or threatened by it. Immediately after our 11 years brutal war, the Truth And Reconciliation Commission (TRC) produced a very important report on social cohesion and integration which the current regime is again turning a blind eye to. To the rationally minded people, the TRC report confirmed the thesis that the poor quality of our ruling elites correlates strongly with the low quality of our development and governance.

The TRC report compares to the current actions of the “Paopa” regime is an indictment on our education system. It explains why, despite our “Paopa” national elites attending national schools together with other nationals, they are some of the most fractious, most divisive and most ethnically alert. If that doesn’t sober up a contraption, I don’t know what will. If our education system produced “Paopa” elites of suspect quality for the national integration project, we need to rethink the actions of this “Paopa” regime urgently. Education, which in terms of social mobility has always been the natural equaliser, has, in terms of social cohesion, sadly become the national divider under our current “Paopa” regime.

SLPP “Paopa” regime must not flinch in the execution of its mandate so that we can heal this contraption and hold to account, in a legal and constitutional manner, those whose conduct and pronouncements seek to divide and destroy this contraption. I wish to give the strong support and commitment of the Bio “Paopa” regime in helping the government fight this mighty vice within the confines of the law. It is important that we devalue the currency of division in our current politics and business.

SHRINKING RESPONSIBILITY

But this issue is not just a matter of law that, as you are all aware, sometimes has serious limitations. The contraption must also occupy the civic realm, where citizens and leaders conduct themselves with utter dignity, and where the public exhibits a zero-tolerance against bad behaviour even when it’s politically organised by very deceitful politicians. When the public politically reward the current Bio led “Paopa” regime ill-conduct, give their attention to their village politics, willing to show up as tools of destruction for the current set of politicians that have nothing to offer, but destruction. That is called shirking responsibility. The public must have the courage of its convictions and help state agencies execute their mandates effectively. Many of us are born into this contraption called Sierra Leone, but few pauses to ask what that really means. We are often quick to claim and assert our citizenship but rarely give a thought to what it means vis a vis others.

Citizenship is an obligation to self, the state, and to each other – in proportions demarcated by, and portions served by, the Constitution. Respecting other Sierra Leoneans, acknowledging that they too have rights, and being our brothers’ and sisters’-keepers is an important element of citizenship. We must willingly give up something for the benefit of others for citizenship to make sense and for nationhood to thrive. Current “Paopa” individual, ethnic, or social insularity and selfishness undermines our successful nation-building. Bigotry, puerile supremacist ethnic and personal egos, discrimination, should have no place in modern societies. Yet in Sierra Leone’s current Bio led “Paopa”, regime these backward ideas continue to be purveyed with reckless and foolish abandon.

RULE OF LAW

When leaders hear these things and fail to condemn these pronouncements, they acquiesce. The tendency to profile and prejudice the other; the illogic of seeking to centralise resources in the hands of the selected few when 60 years of independence has just shown that it results in grotesque inequality and poverty; the misuse of state resources by those occupying our social positions of trust who are currently living beyond their earning powers as they pretend to fight corruption– all these things undermine notions of citizenship.

All human beings are created equal before God. That is religion. All human beings are equal before the law. That is jurisprudence. The Human Genome Project of 1998 established that we are 99.9 per cent the same regardless of race, tribe, colour, sex. That’s science. So the current divisions are socially produced and magnified and commodified by current Bio led “Paopa” elites. For the self-centred majority among them, that’s politics. Whether we want to be together or divided is a choice that we make. It is not preordained. One peaceful, democratic and developed Sierra Leone is possible.

IS CABINET RESHUFFLE A SIGN OF TOUGH LEADERSHIP

Sierra Leone Coat of Arms

IS CABINET RESHUFFLE A SIGN OF TOUGH LEADERSHIP

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

Let’s cut straight to it, what’s tough leadership?
It’s leadership with edge.
Surely not the crazy eccentric edge that relies a lot on luck as we keep on experiencing here in Sierra Leone, but the boldness to go after what you believe (manifesto) and take failure on the chin, without getting knocked out.

One thing is clear, Sierra Leoneans must understand that tough leaders are first and foremost tough taskmasters. They expect the best out of others, but have the highest standards reserved for themselves. They like people and love challenges. A tough leader possesses all the usual leadership traits, but is able to crank it up when the going gets tough.

In short, a tough leader is the whole package Sierra Leoneans need to move the contraption forward in a number of positive ways and free the majority from more than half a century man made poverty and massive deprivation.

If we are to take a genuine look at some of the traits that tough leaders possess, and how these qualities help them emerge victorious in the long run. It is almost impossible to say a cabinet reshuffle in Sierra Leone is a sign of tough leadership and it will help to efficiently address the intractable poverty problems the majority are experiencing.

The fact of the matter remains while we all know that leadership is not for the weak-minded, certain leaders are stronger than others. Strength here, of course, refers to a person’s emotional courage.

A tough leader must harbour the belief that he has what it takes to get a job done and that what he has done is right, and the ability to deal with the consequences.

President, Bio must understand that he’s responsible for the fortunes of the entire country and his each and every move is scrutinised by those around him.
“The higher a monkey climbs, the more people who can see its ass.”

It is very clear that tough leaders don’t complain about wrongs of the past regime; instead they proffer concrete solutions to the wrongs of the past regime by using them as a learning process to realise their social contract mandate with their people.

STOP PUSHING YOUR SELFISH DESIRES IN OUR THROATS

President Maada Bio of Sierra Leone

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

President Bio’s “Paopa” SLPP government was reborn out of the realisation that we could no longer afford to have our domestic politics dictated by an Ernest Bai Koroma APC government without democratic legitimacy. Bio’s SLPP progressed because people became impatient with the majority of APC politicians who wanted to administer rather than govern. And the SLPP grew further yet because people wished to shape the circumstances around them and were demanding a political party successor fully equipped for that task.

“Paopa” SLPP now has the most energized, less empowered and informed electorate of any government in Sierra Leone before this time. Sierra Leone now owns a new generation of citizens who understand that their opinion matters, who believe that their voice will be heard, and who know that their vote can shape the society they live in. The SLPP have led a minority administration and a majority one. Right-minded members of the SLPP understand that minority leadership requires negotiations to recognise honest disagreement and then compromise in the public interest. I have no idea if that experience of minority leaders in the SLPP will ever again come in handy.

If the suffering majority in Sierra Leone were expecting an open discussion on developmental relationship for the general good with the majority of the stakeholders in the Bio led administration to sustain the Party in governance by learning from past mistakes and correct the present ones; their hopes were successfully dashed by a premeditated self-centred establishment now masquerading around as having the support of the suffering majority in Sierra Leone.
The timing for “paopa” SLPP taking over the affairs of the state was very appropriate, but the intention and execution method is killing whatever values their party manifesto would have positively produced to reach its stated “bread and butter” goal for all nationals.

Well if the cries around the country are anything to go by, the plans for the self-centred cabal to promote their greedy desires at the expense of the majority will lead to a potential disaster that will get the Party out of governance if robust, but appropriate actions aren’t swiftly taken to address the plight of the suffering majority. As the cracks between the majority of stakeholders in the party and the people continue to grow. It appears the majority of the nationals are no longer willing to sit idly by and see the selected few satisfy their greedy desires at their own expense. The truth is, the majority of the youth and elders are no longer willing to settle for less this time around and they are calling for Developmental Relationships with the government stakeholders under the following terms:

– Sierra Leone’s suffering majority want stakeholders within the Bio led government to express care for them. Show that, they like them and want the best for them by:

Be Present – the majority of SLPP stakeholders should pay attention when they are with the suffering majority.

Be Warm – Paopa stakeholders should make the suffering majority know they like being with them and express positive feelings and actions towards them.

Invest – stakeholders within “Paopa” must commit time and energy to do things for and with the suffering majority.

Show Interest – stakeholders within the SLPP “Paopa” should make it a priority to understand who the suffering majority are and what they care about.

Be Dependable – stakeholders within the governing SLPP must be people the suffering majority can count on and can trust.

– the suffering majority in Sierra Leone want stakeholders within the governing SLPP and others in social positions of trust to challenge growth by insisting that they try to continuously improve the vulnerable plights of the suffering majority. This can be categories as follows:

Inspire – Help the suffering majority see future possibilities for themselves.

Expect – stakeholders within the governing SLPP must make it clear in actions not by words that they want the suffering majority in Sierra Leone to live up to their potential.

Stretch – Recognise the thoughts and abilities of the suffering majority while also pushing our youth to strengthen them.

Limit – Hold stakeholders within the governing SLPP accountable for appropriate boundaries and rules.

– The suffering majority want stakeholders within the SLPP and others in social positions of trust to provide support for them by helping them complete tasks and goals. This can be divided into:
Encourage – create the enabling environment for all nationals to survive and put the nationals on top of the pyramid to own our economy.

Guide – Provide practical assistance and feedback to help the suffering majority learn tangible things in order to meet the test of times.

Model – Let the majority of stakeholders within the SLPP be an example the youth can learn from and admire.

Advocate – most of the stakeholders of the governing SLPP must stand up for the suffering majority when they need them.
– The suffering majority want stakeholders within the Bio led SLPP and those occupying social positions of trust to share power with them by hearing their voices and letting them share in making decisions. I divide this into the following:

Respect – the suffering majority want key players in the governing SLPP to treat them seriously and fairly.

Give Voice – Ask for and listen to the opinions of the suffering majority and consider them when making decisions.

Respond – the suffering majority want key players within the ruling SLPP to understand and adjust to their needs, interests and abilities.

Collaborate – Work with the suffering majority to accomplish goals and solve problems.

– the suffering majority want the ruling SLPP and others occupying social positions of trust under the current Bio led government to expand possibilities.

Explore – SLPP key players must expand the horizons of the suffering majority that form the bulk of the country’s population and connect them to opportunities that will expose them to new ideas, experiences and places.

Connect – Introduce the suffering majority to people who can help them grow.

Navigate – Help the suffering majority work through barriers that can stop them from achieving their goals.

In short, the present suffering majority want to enjoy opportunities key players within the Bio led administration are currently enjoying.

FASTENER A RICKETY SIERRA LEONE : What You Can Do to Restore Balance

We have a choice.

Here’s something I learned from a remarkable Sunday school screen actor [who demonstrated by attempting to balance a pencil on one finger].

Do you see this pencil? I can get it to balance here for a second or two. But then it wobbles. So I tweak it, to restore balance. If I neglect to tweak it, it falls. It may break. That’s life. An inevitable struggle to restore balance and affirm life. That’s the human condition. And our responsibility is to work ceaselessly to restore this balance and repair our Sierra Leone – which is ever in danger of breaking.

I find this lesson especially resonant in Sierra Leone at this particular time.

For the social benefit sector. For my country, Sierra Leone. And for the majority of our people that continue to face massive political oppression on all fronts from the majority of our current governing politicians.

It boils down to one Hebrew word:

Tzedek.

It means justice. It also means balance.

It’s a word I will keep in my memory all my life as the root of the word tzedakah, which I considered to be more or less equivalent to the word charity. But what I learned from my teacher (late Kofi Annan) is that tzedakah is more about fairness than caring. You do the right and just thing, regardless of how you feel about it.

This, to me, is the broad mission of journalism or activism. It’s a values-based communal endeavour to make our country a better and more caring place. We step into one another’s shoes, imagining that “there before the grace of God.”

Empathy is essential for the survival of society.

Darwin, best known for “survival of the fittest,” actually meant it in an entirely different way than did Herbert Spencer (who borrowed the term). Darwin’s research showed that the fittest societies — those that survived — were those that cared for their members. All of them.

Sierra Leoneans, we have a choice.

Go it alone, or go it together.

Help others, or only help ourselves.

Welcome the stranger in need, or turn our backs.

Insist on straightforwardness and honesty, or succumb to hyperbole, sycophancy and malicious government propaganda.

Forgive honest, humbly-admitted mistakes or embrace self-serving and harmful deceits.

Those who work in the social benefit sector have made their choice.

To embrace public service outcomes; not acquire personal fame, power and money.

To focus not just on “winning,” but on assuring the game is fair for all.

To value the kind and steady hand in a lurching, agitatedly altering, often mean and violent Sierra Leone.

There is much about which reasonable people can disagree.

But what happens when reason leaves the room as we are currently experiencing in Sierra Leone politics?

We rely on moderating influences to restore balance when things get out of whack. That’s why nonprofits have both Executive Directors and Boards of Directors. Staff and volunteers. That’s why the Sierra Leone government has three branches.

But it’s not enough to depend on predictable systems to keep the majority of our unpredictable people in our social positions of trust in check. Especially in a country where fiscal policies are only good for lip service purposes in order to deliberately legitimise state criminality and get away with it. And the creation and circulation of wealth are specifically in the hands of the very exploitative selected few establishments.

When people exceed the limits prescribed by reason, they must be held accountable. But it appears this government of ours has deliberately refused to prosecute people in social positions of trust that amassed unexplained wealth with taxpayers’ monies causing the majority of our nationals to suffer and live in desperate miserable conditions. Whilst those in social positions of trust before and now plus their family members are living in flamboyant lifestyles. As if this is not sufficient, the government continue to service IMF, World Bank and other international debts to an extent they cannot even honour their key campaign promise of providing “bread and butter” for all nationals.

Today, we are currently in an economic situation of: “Earn More Eat Less”. What this actually means is the government is making a sufficient amount of cash to address most of the key areas of its social contract mandate with the people. However, because they have to service debts from these international neocolonial institutions, the government can no longer create a conducive environment for the majority of our people to feed their children the way they used to before. Now we are experiencing more prostitution than before, an increase in death rate, more school dropouts because parents are surely earning less to feed their families, more youth unemployment and mental challenges.

The question is: Is it fair for our government to abandon its key “bread and butter” promised to service international debts at the expense of its people?

That’s when reasonable people must step in.

For more than three years, many Sierra Leoneans have been afraid to speak up publicly, until now. Now we must lean in. To protect the values and ideals upon which our fragile civil society, few independent journalists and democracy rest. To restore balance to a wonky Sierra Leone.

Please let’s make this a possible mission to save our country. When our politicians go low, we go high,” I hear the echo of Tzedek. Justice. Balance.

And I make my choice.

Make yours — as if the balance of Sierra Leone depended on it.

THE BAD POLITICS OF IGNORING JUSTICE TO THE ORDINARY PEOPLE IN SIERRA LEONE

Map of Sierra Leone

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

Whether our justice system has an ethical obligation to address the justice gap in delivering the much needed social services for most of our nationals may strike some as a question far down in the pecking order of legal education. “Keep it real,” would go the argument.

At a time when the country’s economy faces massive challenges with allegations of misappropriation of taxpayers monies by those in social positions of trust, Sierra Leone nationals need to worry more about job creation, health, education, electricity, pure water, hunger, increase in death and the very degrading standard of living for the majority of the nationals plus the justice gap. But a focus on addressing social service delivery and the justice gap are not mutually exclusive.

It doesn’t make sense to me that a massive population of individuals who desperately need their government to genuinely address their basic necessities of life and a large number of people in our social positions of trust who are supposed to be servants to the people in addressing their social challenges; with all the vast mineral deposits we possess, we can’t work together as patriotic nationals with the laws of the land being wisely implemented with no fear or favour and recognise as the symbol of concrete development to sincerely shape the country in all economic activities for the good of all without cheating the ordinary people. But how can this materialise when most of our policymakers decided not to champion the cause of justice for the benefit of the ordinary people but for the selected few by deliberately ignoring fiscal policies?

This is a clear indication that in the past three years, under the current SLPP regime, the people of Sierra Leone aren’t well served by their politicians. And it’s clear that the majority of Sierra Leone politicians don’t care about the ordinary people. This government (Parliament, Executive and Judiciary) presented Sierra Leone as a happy family with healthy economic growth, but it backfired that the government heavily invest in propaganda and manipulation whilst busy using taxpayers monies to satisfy their personal interests with triple or more prices for essential commodities thereby adding more pressure in the lives of the suffering majority. This is coupled with huge international debt, which appears to take place due to a lack of fiscal discipline.

The people of Sierra Leone are manipulated throughout their lives. Our people are manipulated by our politicians from the day they are born till death. And these are not just accurate characters of leaders that want to move their country forward in a number of positive ways. There’s tremendous hatred by the majority of our politicians against ordinary people. The fact is everything the majority of our politicians did in the past three years is a disaster with hidden agenda to exploit the ordinary people. The money in Sierra Leone is being squandered with the ideas of these two political parties(APC and SLPP). In the past three years, the SLPP has been senselessly repeating or even doing more than the very odd things they condemned and campaigned against the APC government when they were in opposition. Most of them failed to understand that this was what paved the way of their party to the current seat of power. I recognise the fact that there are very distinguished politicians within the APC and SLPP, but we need to help them get off the chain of the terribly bad politicians who are bent on destroying this country.

In the past three years, the majority of Sierra Leone politicians proved to be very dishonest and untrustworthy. That’s why leadership trust in Sierra Leone is at an “all-time low. Politicians in Sierra Leone are two-faced liars. They cheat, they are not fair and they disadvantaged the ordinary people from the day they’re born till death. People like this do not deserve to be in social positions of trust! The problem is the next guy we put in there is no better.” We read these kinds of comments regularly about the state of poor leadership in Sierra Leone. But before we go too far in berating, perhaps, we should examine ourselves. We should look at what is happening all around us. Is leadership like the canary in the coal mine? Maybe the old saying is true – we get the kind of rulers we deserve. If we are a nation of cheaters, sycophants, targeting voices of reasoning, and bootlickers, shouldn’t we have untrustworthy people at the helm of our country’s affairs?
So what is happening? Cheating. Cutting Corners. Getting something that is not deserved. The majority of Sierra Leoneans are doing it and the problem is, it appears to be getting worse.

Feelings are bodily events – they just happen, but we can freely choose our attitudes. We are the only animals with free will that enables us to choose to ignore our feelings or go against them. Moreover, we have the intellect to help us make rational judgments about the right attitudes and the right behaviour of those we want to lead us. The reality in the APC and SLPP today is mostly one of the strained relationships, and people often put it down to internal political conflicts or egos. Unfortunately, politics has been given a bad name all over the country by politicians operating within these two political parties. Today, in Sierra Leone, every organisation I know pretends that they aren’t political, trying to prove it by replacing the word with euphemisms like networking, partnering, lobbying, and influencing. But as Aristotle pointed out long ago that human beings are political animals – if we weren’t political, we wouldn’t be human.

So what is politics? The dictionary tells us it’s the science and art of government, but in the context of Sierra Leone, I would define it as faction and one-upmanship, manipulation and exploitation, lying, cheating, and using others as means to your own ends, or simply the exercise of power to oppress the ordinary people. But none of those things is politics – they are simply what they say they are – instances of Sierra Leone human beings hurting and using other Sierra Leone nationals. Politics is something else altogether, unique to humans. Politics is possible in human society because we can transcend our animal instincts and build communities on the principle of justice, which by definition, is a moral concept. Without morality, there can be no politics but just barbarism. Politics is nothing more than how we order our lives together in justice. And justice is either for everybody or nobody.

Teddy Roosevelt words: “This country won’t be a good place for any of us unless it’s a good place for all of us” apply to all businesses, families, communities, and countries. So if politics is essentially about how we order our lives together, then it’s about our relationships, one-on-one, in groups, and community.

Therefore it’s unpatriotic and an act of clean, convenient hypocrisy for anyone in social positions of trust in Sierra Leone to deliberately ignore the laws of the land and ask the ordinary people in mosques and churches to pray for our country. God seriously frown at hypocrisy. The majority of our politicians in Sierra Leone keep on embezzling state resources and undermining the laws at the expense of the ordinary people and sleep away with it. Unfortunately, these same politicians hypocritically turn to the ordinary people and ask them to pray for the country and its leaders whilst they undermine the excellent work of Audit Service Sierra Leone. If these politicians want to tackle the problems of the economy why can’t they chase the unexplained wealth they keep on amassing? I believe the easiest way to discover the guidelines for good relationships to forge ahead with our country in a number of tangible ways is to ask, “What qualities do you admire in other people?” because then we quickly learn what we expect from one another.

The most common responses I have received in workshops over the years have been respect, honesty, confidence, wisdom, courage, self-control, fairness, creativity, integrity, and aspiration. These are the qualities that help people build positive relationships, and therefore they are the qualities each of us need to try and cultivate in our own lives for the sake of our country. The value of these qualities is easily confirmed if we contrast them with their opposites: contempt, dishonesty, cynicism, foolishness, cowardice, self-indulgence, unfairness, narrow-mindedness, inconsistency, and complacency. These are quite obviously the qualities that undermine relationships. Significantly, all the work I have done with leaders and teams in most categories, the public service, and the professions has revealed again and again that there are just four main factors that make the building of effective teams impossible. Those factors are cynicism, hypocrisy, complacency, and contempt. As long as people cling to those mindsets, there is little chance of any country functioning as a team to realise its target.

Conversely, the starting point for building an effective team is to inspire and nurture the opposites of those four factors – confidence, aspiration, and respect – in the people required to work as a unit. Notice that all of the qualities identified are attitudes.
But what can we do about attitudes, for heaven’s sake? Though we use the terms frequently every day, most people often confuse attitudes with emotions – they are, in fact, very different things, affecting one another, to be sure, but distinct mental states nonetheless. An emotion is, in the words of Mortimer Adler: “…a passion that the body suffers and we consciously experience when a complex set of bodily reactions occurs: changes in respiration and pulse, changes in epidermal electricity, increases of blood sugar and adrenalin in the blood due to reaction on the part of the glands of internal secretion, papillary dilation or contraction. In short, an emotion is a widespread, violent bodily commotion that is consciously experienced and accompanied by strong impulses to act in a certain way.” Examples of emotions would be fear, anxiety, anger, sadness, enjoyment, exhilaration, disgust, and shame.

An attitude, by contrast, is a self-chosen mindset about how we stand in relation to other people, to the world around us, and to ourselves. It is an act of will that shapes our behaviour towards others and ourselves. Feelings are bodily events – they just happen, but we can freely choose our attitudes. We are the only animals with free will that enables us to ignore our feelings or go against them. Moreover, we have the intellect to help us make rational judgments about the right attitudes and the right behaviour.

What then are good or positive attitudes, and what is bad and negative attitudes?

Quite simply, good attitudes promote well-being, while bad attitudes cause harm – to ourselves, others, and the world around us. So we can safely say the majority of our politicians possess a bad attitude towards developing the country, judging from the resources we own and the level of abject poverty they keep on forcing the majority of our nationals to live with. This can be easily tested by listing the attitudes of other leaders that help build their countries, and we quickly discover that they simply follow on from the list of qualities people admire in others. Caring, hard-working, adventurous, curious, cooperative, generous, and persevering are just some of the attitudes that fit neatly into the earlier list. And they are all qualities encouraged by the experts on emotional intelligence.

By contrast, bad attitudes are exposed as extensions of the list of qualities that break down a country. Selfish, lazy, complacent, credulous, uncooperative, greedy, and submissive all fit logically into the list of qualities people dislike in others, qualities that make living together and development difficult. The empowering reality is that we really are in control of our own destiny. Epictetus and many other great philosophers have told us that our happiness depends on the choices we make and that our well-being ultimately depends on our well-doing. That means we are in a position to change our lives for the better by ordering our attitudes according to what are, after all, pretty clear guidelines. If the objectives of national politics are teamwork and fulfilment, both personal and corporate, then it is clear that those objectives will only be achieved when the attitudes of the majority of people involved are positively aligned. Human nature being what it is, this means that the best any country can work towards is having positive attitudes in the majority of its people in social positions of trust who can nurture the rest of the country for genuine positive change. Corporate culture is always shaped by the leaders, as role models and coaches, nurturing good attitudes.

The final analysis comes back to each individual. What kind of person do you want to be – one who helps order our lives together in justice and compassion, or one who puts self above all other considerations? We live in a country that actively encourages selfish attitudes and desperately need people who will restore our hope in the community. You can make a country of difference. It’s your own character, and therefore your own personal fulfilment in life, that is at stake.

THE MENACES OF NOT PROSECUTING ERNEST BAI KOROMA

Ernest Bai Koroma

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

Julius Made Bio is wary of a legal reckoning against his predecessor, but to let Ernest Bai Koroma go would be to sanction future corruption in Sierra Leone. As he gears up in his more than three years as President of Sierra Leone, one of the biggest dilemmas confronting Julius Maada Bio is what to do with the former Commander ln Chief. Ernest Bai Koroma refusal to leave his illegal position as active Chairman and ruler of the All People’s Congress and his fomenting of a farcical coup against right-minded people in the All People’s Congress are just his latest crimes against Sierra Leone democracy.

As president, Ernest Bai Koroma cannot be charged with any crimes. But after the 2018 General Elections, when Bio assumed the presidency, Ernest Bai Koroma’s protected status ended and he’s no less than an ordinary citizen. As such, Ernest Bai Koroma will be vulnerable to criminal prosecution. Already, there is an array of offences that he can plausibly be charged with. Koroma’s actions demonstrated that he used the office of the presidency for corrupt ends. The signing of the rogue Income Electrics contract, the unconstitutional ways of using state funds, and Koroma’s own words on many occasions, documented clear obstruction of justice. Koroma’s badly negotiated mining contracts with Frank Timis who was very closed to him, his direct interference with the judiciary and other democratic institutions to buy the silence of these institutions and his conflict of interest to make money for himself and the rest of his family members by awarding the unmerited contract to them at the expense of the general public. As a private citizen, Koroma can be charged for his own role in these matters.

Audit Service Sierra Leone reports and several newspapers documented that the Koroma government engaged in creative accounting that perhaps oversteps the law. As the newspapers reported, “Two separate iron ore fraud contracts, Iluka rutile mining fraud contract, toll gate fraud contract, Boglori fraud contract, Wilkinson Road fraud contract, ferries importation fraud contract, rice importation fraud contract given to his younger brother and many more into former President Koroma and his businesses, have expanded to include tax write-offs on millions of dollars, some of which appear to have gone to his family members, according to people with knowledge of the matter.”

Beyond these cases, there are numerous acts Ernest Bai Koroma committed as president, such as his business deals with the mining burster Frank Timis, his contract with Sierra Rutile that haven’t been sufficiently investigated because Ernest Bai Koroma was able to stonewall Parliamentary oversight. Koroma’s ability to fend off legislative scrutiny, Koroma’s money laundering allegations and his well-inflated infrastructure contracts across the country also ended with his presidency and one can expect an avalanche of revelations about wrongdoing.

But will the Sierra Leone People’s Party Democrats have the nerve to follow through with investigating Ernest Bai Koroma? Will the current Bio administration set loose the Anti-Corruption Commission and the Department of Justice to target Ernest Bai Koroma wrongs? There’s reason to think this won’t happen. Rumours from West Africa former rulers cartel states the “cartel has privately told President Bio that he shouldn’t allow his presidency to be consumed by investigations of his predecessor, according to people familiar with the discussions, despite pressure from some patriotic Sierra Leone People’s Party members who want inquiries into former Ernest Bai Koroma, his policies and members of his administration.” The rumour added, “the former West Africa rulers cartel in association with certain rogue International None Governmental Organisations has raised concerns that investigations would further divide a country Bio is trying to unite and risk making every day of his presidency about Koroma.” At the moment, it appears Bio’s government mistake to grant travelling licences to Ernest Bai Koroma to leave the country as and when he pleases helped Ernest Bai Koroma to create serious political pressure behind the scene for a Bio Department of Justice to refrain from prosecuting him. As one states, “One of the reasons [Bio] has given aides is that he believes investigations would alienate the million Sierra Leoneans who voted for the All People’s Congress.”

Beyond that, there’s little reason to believe that legal punishment would do anything to blunt Ernest Bai Koroma as a political force. Ernest Bai Koroma is an established West African cartel political rogue, which means that his supporters see any clash between him and legal authorities as proof that he is shaking up the status quo. Sierra Leone People’s Party has often expressed amazement and exasperation that scandals that would destroy a normal politician have not tarnished Koroma’s appeal at all. But as a strong member of the West Africa rogue political cartel, he’s not expected to obey the rules of the game. In fact, evidence that he cuts corners is favourably reinterpreted as defiance. Not pro-West Africa rogue system politicians like John Dramani Mahama and Gbagbo are much more likely to be held accountable by their successors if accused of being corrupt.

Years of experience continue to teach us that West Africa rogue politicians have sometimes gotten away with lurid corruption. Consider the fabled careers of Lansana Conte, Olusegun Obansanjo, Blaise Campaore, Gnassingbe Eyadema etc. If Ernest Bai Koroma is not convicted of crimes, he’s likely to follow the path of these West African rogue system politicians. As it stands, it appears Bio’s government legal prosecution will do nothing to fight the popularity of Ernest Bai Koroma. Indeed, given his close association with the West African rogue rulers cartel persona, it is likely to bind him closer to his followers. He’ll be seen as a martyr.
Having said that, not prosecuting Ernest Bai Koroma will also come with a cost. Sierra Leone is a nation of rogue politicians and elite impunity, as the history of recent decades demonstrates.

Ernest Bai Koroma inherited a sound economic footing from late President Ahmad Tejan Kabbah and spent ten years two weeks as President of Sierra Leone destroying the democratic values he inherited from his predecessor. But it now appears the intervention of the West African rogue rulers cartel will make Ernest Bai Koroma receive an expansive pardon from Julius Maada Bio. If this happens, Bio will cover all crimes Ernest Bai Koroma might have committed as president, even those yet undiscovered. It’s hard to interpret this pardon as affirming anything other than the idea that a Sierra Leonean president can never face legal liability, no matter what.

The rogue S.L. Mining contract and rogue Iluka Sierra rutile contract are about to close because their concession period is about to end, and they’ve made a huge amount of profit. The rogue African Minerals contract, the habits of using taxpayers monies with no respect to fiscal policy etc. should be seen as a successful cover-up, with underlings taking the fall for actions that were almost certainly sanctioned by Ernest Bai Koroma and his puppets. Subsequently, many of those underlings, notably his family members and stooges, are about to receive pardons that will free them from jail terms whilst the poor and vulnerable continue to languish in jail. A similar code of criminal silence, or omertà, could be seen in the Ernest Koroma administration, with most of his main relatives whilst the suffering majority served as the patsy in cases of conflict of interest contracts awarded to them. They are also subsequently going to receive a pardon.

 

POLITICAL ANATOMY OF MARKET SELLOFF IN SIERRA LEONE

Map of Sierra Leone

POLITICAL ANATOMY OF MARKET SELLOFF IN SIERRA LEONE

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

Some commentators have rushed to describe the recent national market turmoil as “historic” and “unprecedented,” yet its evolution has been quite traditional so far.

What may be different this time, however, is whether during and after the pandemic, long term stability can be restored with the policy tools that were available in the past.

The selloff started as a repricing of national growth prospects. Mounting evidence of economic weakness in the emerging Sierra Leone economy during the pandemic, along with persistently low growth in other sectors of the economy, made it hard for our market to ignore the impact on earnings and profitability of a national slowdown.

The selloff accelerated as fears spread that our policymakers may not be able to respond sufficiently quickly and efficiently to the pressure of the COVID-19 pandemic. Part of this worry has to do with the extent to which our Central Bank has depleted its ammunition store after years of carrying the bulk of the policy burden. But a more significant concern arises from the correct realisation that the primary response would have to come from our political leaders that are the source of growth and financial concerns this time, and not from the professionals in these sectors.

As is often the case in Sierra Leone, the selloff further gathered steam when traders realised that policy circuit breakers would not materialise immediately. The rout become disorderly for a short while when classic deleveraging technical forces, including forced generalised selling by volatility sensitive market investors and overextended portfolios, took hold of the markets. This result was the conventional mix of price air pockets, valuation overshoots and contagion.

Those are the typical stages of a generalised national market selloff by politicians. This cycle exhausts itself once prices come down sufficiently to create compelling bargains for sidelined investable funds. This tends to happen first for the best-managed companies with resilient balance sheets, and then it spreads to the market as a whole. And there is a lot of dry powder out there, including cash in the hands of households and companies that can be deployed in investment purchases or funds parked in bonds whose yields have fallen and that will look for higher return opportunities.

Long term asset price stabilisation could also come from a reinforcement of the markets’ economic and policy underpinning. But with Sierra Leone economic growth consistently failing to take off in the hands of our two major political parties (APC and SLPP), this responsibility has fallen in the recent past mainly to our central bank, led by our politicians the system traditional core. This time, however, genuine and durable stabilisation will require that a good part of Sierra Leone economic solution come from genuine emerging young politicians as nearly all our old politicians continue to fail us.

Given the economic and political challenges in many of the systemically important sectors of our economy, it will take time for growth to come back strongly and for comprehensive policy solutions to emerge. This could include the deepening of structural reforms without recycling people, the balancing of aggregate or the lifting of pockets of over-leverage and over-indebtedness. Or we must start to hold our politicians responsible for living flamboyant lifestyles. The ACC already set the pace in this drive by prosecuting for possession of unexplained wealth! And the judiciary must continue by convicting for such an offence.

As a result, the best that can be hoped for right now in Sierra Leone is short term market stabilisation through another series of liquidity-driven band-aids. This approach will provide much appreciated immediate relief, but it wouldn’t be sufficient to deliver the longer-term anchor of stability that the Sierra Leone financial system is searching for.

THE COVERED TRUTH ON LOST EBOLA FUNDS

Ebola

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

Lot is often made of past APC regime corruption and one of such scandals was some $3 million misappropriated in aid donations given to fight the Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone.

But former Sierra Leone’s President, Ernest Bai Koroma, after his government published an audited report on Ebola funds, turned the accountability tables around by requesting an audit of the international community’s claimed expenditures to his government during the Ebola tragedy.

The truth was more than $3 million in foreign aid contributions was donated in support of the Ebola response and much of it appears to have never reached the intended recipients in Sierra Leone. Many recall the lack of payment of local health workers on the front lines of the epidemic – One could not determine where a significant portion of this aid money went.

From official information published, the largest donors to the cause are the U.S. and the U.K., who together contributed more than half of the $3.3 billion in total funds thus far. If you’re a taxpayer residing in any of the countries that donated to the fight against Ebola in Sierra Leone, this is your money. So here’s a rundown of why it’s hard to follow and why Sierra Leoneans are still asking to know the truth behind these funds:

First, let me clearly establish that it’s inherently complicated to track large donations. It wasn’t like millions went straight to one organisation on the ground. Rich governments and big private donors pledged millions, which went to large groups who determined how to spend the money, they then passed the funds to other groups to take action, or who gave the money to more groups to take action, etcetera.

A few institutions gave their donations directly to the governments of affected countries—but that’s generally rare. Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea are among the poorest in the world. As a result of all of the parties involved, tracking donations is like taking a turbulent trip down white water rapids. Funds were merged, divided, and changed over time.

We can start at the source of the river: Asking how much money went to the Ebola response in affected countries. According to the UN Office of the Special Envoy on Ebola, donors have pledged $5.1 billion and the World Bank puts the figures at $6.7 billion. No one is lying. Agencies differed because donations were ongoing and different groups count different categories of funds. But in either case, only about half of the amount pledged has left donor pockets.

It is better then we go with what’s been “committed” or “contributed”. In other words, how much money at least made the first step to bank accounts of organisations that further spent it. For a better description of these categories click the link below to see the report by global health policy expert, Karen Grépin;

International donations to the Ebola virus outbreak: too little, too late?

The United Nation’s online financial tracker from the Office of the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs is helpful in this regard. It puts Ebola donations to West Africa at $3.3 billion. According to this source, the US government donated $1.58 billion.

Yet that differs from the total on the US’s Ebola Response report WEST AFRICA – EBOLA OUTBREAK, the discrepancy then, and in part, I learned is because the USAID counts Ebola funds going outside of West Africa as well. Meanwhile, the UK’s aid agency, the Department for International Development (DFID), tabulates a different number from that listed by the UN because they’ve not yet notified people at the UN’s tracker.

But DFID told me they’d prefer I use their figure of $668 million, which includes funds allocated for Ebola recovery. But “allocated” and “committed” and “contributed” are meaningful words. It is better to go with another DFID figure, $389 million because it more closely matches how the totals of other countries in the UN’s report are calculated.

(Who donated: Private including Paul Allen Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates: $198 million, Germany: $179 million, World Bank: $140 million, European Commission: $129 million, France $108 million, USA: $151 billion, UK: $389 million) another 60 or so government and financial institutions.

Head spinning? Hold on, that’s just the first step. I wanted to know who received donor funds.

A 25th February 2015, (Updated 7 April 2015) Report, from the UN Office of the Special Envoy on Ebola, shows how $1.4 billion of the donations have been allocated, or earmarked for the first round of organisations on the receiving end. (UNICEF is the UN’s fund for children $377 million; WFP is the UN’s World Food Programme $224 million; IFRC is the Red Cross $138 million; MSF is Doctors Without Borders $36 million; MPTF is a trust fund where dozens of countries and some private donors pool their money $140 million; and “No detail” is literally listed as such in the report $130 and other UN $8 million)

The other half of the $3.3 billion? Heck, beats me. What about the amounts of money that went to each of the three affected countries—Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea? They do not track such figures.

I looked into large organisations and agencies that received funds to learn more. According to the World Food Programme, in a Report titled WFP West Africa Ebola Response Situation Report #28 08 May 2015, the agency has gotten $322 million. WFP bullet-point several achievements in their report: such as transporting 13,700 passengers and distributing food to hundreds of thousands of people. But they don’t provide line items that detail who exactly pocketed that money, and how much, for these services.

Just one more example: the UK government (DFID) thus far spent $46 million on a single Ebola Treatment Unit (Kerry Town) in Sierra Leone operated by the NGO Save the Children.

Stretching Save the Children to see how they spent DFID’s money, they replied that I was wrong to allege that they spent that amount. In fact, they’ve spent $18.9 million and treated 280 Ebola patients at their unit. Staff salaries and living expenses in Sierra Leone amounted to some $12 million, the press officer wrote. The remainder covered costs of equipping the hospital, transport of medical staff and hospital overhead. Government sources then said they never admitted up to 100 Ebola patients at Kerry Town.

Is $12 million on salaries and living expenses justifiable when just 280 patients were treated over a few months? I don’t know the answer, but perhaps it’s a conversation worth having.

I met local nurses in the national health system in Sierra Leone who cared for twice as many patients. These nurses live in one-room houses, share mattresses, and can’t afford shoes for their children. They are desperate for $80 in so-called hazard pay per week.

Might some donor money have been better spent on the local health system? Maybe. Maybe not. But if budgets continue to be opaque, it’s impossible to learn how to optimise aid to countries that desperately need it. As Alexander Kentikelenis, a sociologist at the University of Cambridge says, “There is no shortage of good intentions. The question is, to what extent NGOs help in the ways that really matter.”

SIERRA LEONE GOVERNMENT HUMBLED: PEOPLE CAN SEE WORLD BANK AND IMF MEAN DISASTER

Sierra Leone, World bank and IMF

by Mahmud Tim Kargbo

So it’s ding ding! Seconds out! And we begin the final round of that international slugfest, the World Bank and IMF negotiations. Out of their corners came President Bio and Finance Minister Dennis Vandi, shrugging their shoulders and beating their chests – and I just hope you aren’t one of those trusting souls who still think it could really go either way. The fix is in. The whole thing is about as pre-ordained as a bout between Giant Haystacks and Big Daddy; and in this case, I am afraid, the inevitable outcome is a victory for the World Bank and IMF, with Sierra Leone lying flat on the canvas with 12 stars circling symbolically over our semi-conscious head.

I suppose there may be some aspects of the Chequers proposals that they pretend not to like. They may puff about “cherry-picking” the Chinese loans to Sierra Leone specifically the cancelled Mamamah airport. There may be some confected groaning and twanging of leotards when it comes to the discussion on World Bank/IMF rebuilding the economy they help battered in the previous regimes. But the reality is that in this negotiation the World Bank and IMF have so far taken every important trick. The Sierra Leone government has agreed to hand over millions of taxpayers’ money and natural resources for two-thirds of diddly squat from the World Bank and IMF.

In adopting the Chequers proposals, we have gone into battle with the white flag fluttering over our leading tank. If we continue on this basis we will throw away most of the advantages of Sierra Leone. By agreeing to a “common rulebook” with the World Bank and IMF – over which we have no control – we are making it impossible for Sierra Leone to be more competitive, to innovate, to deviate, to initiate, and we are ruling out major free trade deals that will help us rebuild our economy with indigenous nationals in the thick of it all and address our social challenges.

If we go ahead with the Chequers proposals, we are forswearing the project of global Sierra Leone – so splendidly articulated by the President in his UN General Assembly speech of September 23, 2021 – and abandoning the notion of Sierra Leone as a proud independent economic actor. We will remain in the World Bank and IMF taxi; but this time locked in the boot, with absolutely no say on the destination. We won’t have taken back control – we will have lost control. We will serve as a terrible warning to any other African or developing country thinking of changing its relationship with the exploitative World Bank and IMF neo-colonial financial institutions: that even Sierra Leone, one of the richest countries in terms of mineral resources, with a new government that promised “New Direction”, was unable to break free of the gravitational pull of the World Bank and IMF and forced to sue for humiliating terms.

Of course, I hope that the President will still change course – and rediscover the elan
and dynamism of his above mentioned UN General Assembly speech and scores of international and national interviews. With more than one year until the end of his presidency period, there is still ample time to save Sierra Leone. If we are to do so, we must go back to the issue of the role played by World Bank and IMF in destroying our economy in the past regime(s), which has been so ingeniously manipulated – both by World Bank/ IMF and parts of the Sierra Leone Government – so as to keep Sierra Leone effectively in the hands of these very exploitative neo-colonial financial institutions to get very easy access to our country’s natural resources and fixed assets.

Instead of really tackling the problem of the economy we have allowed it to be occluded by myths. It is a myth – pure nonsense – to state that there is “no economic value in getting a new airport or the contract was badly negotiated” so it must be cancelled. Of course, the current government can renegotiate the deal and make it better. These are two separate governments, and on either side, you will find plenty of differences: for instance, as part of the new negotiations, the current Bio led government would have negotiated with the Chinese to make the whole Mamamah area right down to Mile 91 an economic zone with big-time industries to manufacture and distribute finished goods within West Africa and beyond.

It is a myth to say that you could create an effective “economy” – by renewing your exploitative partnership with the World Bank and IMF on the pittance they continue to give your government as loans after deducting the usual 10% from the loan.

And above all, it is a total myth to say that by dancing to the World Bank/ IMF music government will improve social service protection for the suffering majority or rebuild its international image in human rights violations.

The tragedy is that as soon as the President cancelled the contract, the World Bank/ IMF began working on their very exploitative methods to sustain their looting in Sierra Leone. Our Government got lost in an eternal dither and couldn’t make up minds, for months after months, to satisfy World Bank and IMF, and

  • They failed to seize the opportunity of re-evaluating the Mamamah airport contract and add value to it for the good of the nation.
  • They failed to renegotiate the rogue Masiaka toll gate contract and get the better out of it.
  • They failed to renegotiate the badly arranged mining contracts of Ernest Bai Koroma due to international pressure by corporate rogues of the SL Mining…

It is now clear that some members of the current Government never wanted solutions. They wanted to use that problem to attract World Bank and IMF back to Sierra Leone and they enjoy doing so even if it takes to stop a proper contract from the previous regime. Solving Mamamah would mean a solution from the previous regime, and they didn’t really want that.

Freetown
broken clouds
25.8 ° C
25.8 °
25.8 °
94 %
2.1kmh
75 %
Thu
28 °
Fri
29 °
Sat
28 °
Sun
29 °
Mon
26 °
0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe